Nells Reviews and Observations: REVIEW: Life For Ruth / Walk in the Shadow (1962)

LIFE FOR RUTH (1962)

aka: WALK IN THE SHADOW (USA/1966)

John Harris (Michael Craig) and his wife Pat (Janet Munro) have an eight year old daughter named Ruth. One day, their neighbor’s son Teddy goes with Ruth and her parents to the nearby seaside cliffs to collect driftwood for Ruth’s grandfather. Other children on the beach kick Ruth’s ball into the water, so Teddy decides they should take a nearby rowboat out to retrieve it.

The kids soon find themselves in rough waters, which threaten to crash the small boat against jagged rocks. Ruth screams for her father, as he makes his way down the cliffs to them. Teddy falls overboard, so John swims over to him first. He manages to get the boy over to a rescue boat, then swims back to rescue Ruth. But by the time he gets to her, she is in the water with a head wound.

Next, John and Pat are in a hospital, waiting for news of Ruth’s condition. Teddy is fine and sent home, but Dr. Brown (Patrick McGoohan) informs them that Ruth has lost a lot of blood, and is in desperate need of a blood transfusion.

As soon as John hears this, he says she “mustn’t have a blood transfusion”. Dr. Brown is shocked to hear that the “giving and taking of blood” against John’s religion. Brown tells him that they aren’t “living in the dark ages”. Dr. Brown leaves the room in a hurry to get Dr. Harvard to help plead his case, and Pat pleads with her husband to allow the transfusion.

The doctors return, but Dr. Harvard tells the unrelenting parents they need to sign a form absolving the hospital from all blame if Ruth dies. Brown continues to plead with the couple, to no avail.

John and Pat go home, and Brown takes the opportunity to set up a transfusion anyway. He feels it is his decision to make, not the parents’. He tries to contact the head of the hospital for permission, but can’t. Harvard tells him without Marshall’s approval, he won’t allow Brown to continue.

At home, John consoles his wife, telling her in the eyes of God, and by His law, they are doing right. John firmly believes Ruth will be alright. But as soon as she is alone, Pat runs to the hospital to see Dr. Brown, and tells him to go through with the blood transfusion. But it is too late. Brown drives Pat back home, and she confronts her husband. “I saw her die” she tells him.

From this point, the plot revolves around the relationship between John and Pat (strained, due to Pat not having been born into her husband’s religion, and therefore easily doubting it’s teachings), and Dr. Brown trying to get what he feels is justice for Ruth, in order to prevent other children from dying due to what he feels are fanatical religious beliefs. It all culminates in the father's trial under a British child-cruelty law.

(I am not describing the second half of the film as, really, it should be watched fresh and the viewer allowed to form their own opinions on the topic.)

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Munro pleads with McGoohan...
just a slight height difference!

I have to admit, knowing what the film was about, I wasn't really looking forward to watching it. But since it had Patrick McGoohan's, I sought it out and did indeed watch the whole film. It actually went by rather quickly, meaning it wasn't the chore I expected it to be.

Not only is the topic of religious freedom covered, but also the idea of The State having more control over people's children than parents. In the film, Dr. Brown mentions more than once he feels the State should be able to step in and give treatment to a child regardless of parents' views. This premise feels very modern, given events such as the Justina Pelletier case in Boston and the Charlie Gard situation in England.

The film never flat out tells us just what Ruth's parents religion is, and while this does seem a little odd, I am guessing this was done to protect the studio from libel. But it appears the Harris family is Jehovah's Witnesses. Other characters are identified as Jewish, Catholic, and Church of England, while the doctor is portrayed as more of a man of science, probably agnostic. The wife converted in order to marry Harris, but never really agreed with his beliefs.

Having all these religions mixed into one film could have been asking for real trouble, but in the end, the viewer gets the point of the story, without their own religion being insulted. No one is ever actually proven right or wrong. You can side with whichever character you wish, for the most part. This is one reason I found the film palatable. Only the most fanatical may be offended.

As for production, there are some interesting shots showing ominous skies and seas, interesting camera angles, etc. Acting is good overall, Harris being perfect as the father. Munro was a bit "weepy" for my tastes, but her portrayal of a conflicted mother and wife is for the most part not too "syrupy". McGoohan plays Dr. Brown in a very quiet and restrained manner. I expected at least one major burst of anger from him (ala "Danger Man" or "Prisoner"), but he kept things low-key. In fact, his first batch of lines are delivered so softly I had to turn up the volume to hear them! One wonders what famously Catholic McGoohan personally thought about the film’s subject.

All in all, I'd say this was a rather dark, but well made film of a touchy topic, which is handled fairly and doesn't insult or take sides. I'd like to have seen a little more "fire" from the main characters in certain scenes, but that's just one person's opinion.

If you'd prefer not to watch this film as a lowish quality online copy, it is available as a Region 2 (non-US) DVD from Network in the UK.